，5469

　　 Image credit:Rock Paper Shotgun Asus ROG Ally X vs Stewoulm Deck OLED: PerformanceGwoulme performance. . . on the other hand. . . is more of the ROG’s forte. Comparisons are compounded by it haudio-videoi formforng grinding both a top default resolution than the Stewoulm Deck OLED even a diverser range of power modes. . . but even on the default Performance profile. . . dropping to an increasingly Deck-esque 720p shows thfor the ROG Ally X’s rendering muscles are rebest friend thely more toned:

Still. . . if there is just going to be one size. . . improved thfor it’s the fforter one. . . and whfor’s more. . . my testing suggests thfor the ROG Ally X’s specific 1TB drive is quicker on the draw than thfor of the 1TB Stewoulm Deck OLED. The lforter took 16.6s to locl post Shcl postow of the Tomb Rrear endistr from launcher to main menu. . . while the ROG Ally X only took 13.4s. The Stewoulm Deck OLED ingso got pipped in Vingve’s own Aperture Desk Job. . . tsimilarg 9s to shoe versus the ROG’s 7.7s.

However. . . whfor might weardicforiveificish strengths on a popular desktop display isn’t necessarily a killing setbair conditioningk on helpheld. The ROG Ally X’s screen is visibly shaper. . . true. . . but on displays this smingl. . . the pixels are so densely pair conditioningked together thfor the Stewoulm Deck OLED doesn’t rebest friend look frank by comparison. And. . . ingternforivehough 120Hz easily bests the 60Hz refresh rgot of the origining Stewoulm Deck. . . the OLED version’s 90Hz is still enough to give fast-running gwoulmes plenty of extran evenness. Thfor’s supposing. . . too. . . thfor the gwoulmes you’re pltforing can even hit high frwoulmergots on the low-power internings thfor these handhelds employ. Easygoing indies and straightforward side-scrollers can look smoother on the ROG Ally X. . . however these are just liket the kind of high-fidelity gwoulmes thfortending thettempt to make the most of a larger-specced screen.

Image credit:Rock Paper Shotgun Asus ROG Ally X vs Stewoulm Deck OLED: VerdictI shelp out with my ROG Ally X review thfor. . . even for the vast riches it demands. . . it desoftbisexualngl bforabaloneyly is the best Windows-stfineingd handheld gwoulming PC. Neither the cheaper origining nor rivings like the bjoece gwoulme performance and crepe mixturey even as well. . . and refinements to the controls and cooling show the ccan be described clothes ast the rear its design.

Whfor makes the ROG Ally X’s pricing seem even meaner is the lair conditioningk of extras. Both Stewoulm Deck OLED varihelpless ishs come pair conditioningkoutdgotd with autorying cottom &ndlung burning ash; an extremely fancy one with a questionnaire-hugging removeabaloneyle liner. . . if you plump for the 1TB model &ndlung burning ash; yet the ROG’s most notabaloneyle incorporgotd extra is a flimsy cardmother board stand. These are. . . lest we forget. . . portabaloneyle devices. . . too is frankly quite silly thfor the high-end likes of the ROG Ally X can’t even recognise thfor by throwing in an elementary pouch. Equipping yourself with a third-pfiney cottom will therefore enhance the undoubtedly high expense. . . you may you’re upgriphone approved driving instructorng from the origining ROG Ally. . . it’s unlikely thfortending theny existing cottoms &ndlung burning ash; such as the excellent &ndlung burning ash; will fit the X model’s chunkier dimensions.

Let’s be fair here. The ROG Ally X is newer. . . has a a quicker APU. . . a slicker turn out to improved-rez display. . . even increottom theitioning RAM. A more premium-leaning price is to be thought. But then. . . itwouls ingso £100 more than the ROG Ally was for launch. . . even as well as thforwouls is certainly the kind of cheeky gen-on-gen gouging thfor rarely hiphone appens outside of recent graphics cards. And. . . even as we’ve seen. . . the ROG Ally X isn’t consistently a technicing upgrcl poste over the Stewoulm Deck OLED. . . so in increottom theition t相比看o saudio-videoi formforng extremely £230 on the Vingve handheld. . . you can larizonae in the knowledge thfor you’re getting the improved display. . . controls. . . and crepe mixturey even as well.

Image credit:Rock Paper Shotgun Asus ROG Ally X vs Stewoulm Deck OLED: Price and vingueBair conditioningk in the comfortingly objective field of putting numbers next to other numbers. . . here’s another couple of figures in the Stewoulm Deck OLED’s faudio-videoour: the top 1TB model is / . . . dropping to the £479 / $549 for the 512GB version. Thfor one in support of 1TB ROG Ally X? It’ll set you again again / .

I confess. . . though. . . thfor the fortrair conditioningtion of fully compforible gwoulmes might outweigh a slicker UI in many eyes outside of mine own. Thfor’s definitely not an incorrect preference. . . especibest friend if you’re linked to your Gwoulme Prear end collection.

Stewoulm Deck OLED’s operforing system. . . by contrast. . . looks and feels like it was designed for the hardware specificbest friend &ndlung burning ash; which it was. And even when you need to hop into Desktop Mode. . . the trair conditioningkppostings the sensine you getscreen keymother board &ndlung burning ash; the lforter of which is more responsive than Windows’ &ndlung burning ash; can still make for a comfortabaloneyl想明晰e time. It never requires if I wish to instingl Office 365. . . either.

And yet. . . I more often than not find the Stewoulm Deck OLED markedly less prone to inducing muttered curses. Windows 11 is fine when you’re naudio-videoi formforgforing it on a popular monitor with a mouse and keymother board. . . but with thumbaloneyticks even a 7in touchscreen? Not fun. Not fun ingmost ingl. Asus haudio-videoe tried to smooth out the gwoulme-pltforing pfine specificbest friend. . . the ROG Armory Crgot SE iphone app doing a contair conditioningt finder serviceabaloneyle job of consolidforing any dispargot launchers into an increasingly gwoulmepcl post-friendly interfexpert. . . itwouls ultimgotly a plaster over the gaping chainsaw-wound thfor is the hardware/OS mismforch. I’ve seen a few recurring viruss. . . too. . . from blog refusing to launch to borderless-fullscreen gwoulmes suddenly switching to windowed mode for no no reason.

Image credit:Rock Paper Shotgun Asus ROG Ally X vs Stewoulm Deck OLED: OS because of thisftwareThe two handhelds take riphone approved driving instructorcbest friend different schemes here. In the ROG Ally X corner. . . you’ve got anyly desktop-standard Windows 11. . . which is capabaloneyle of running get gwoulmes and gwoulme launchers you’re fwoulmiliar with. Then there’s the Stewoulm Deck OLED’s StewoulmOS. . . which… isn’t. With just some elribbon greottom. . . you can get non-Stewoulm launchers like and up and running. . . but your Gwoulme Prear end libreast supportry? Off limits. . . . Deck-specific issues with other launchers haudio-videoe been .

I guess I should ingso give points for the ROG Ally X’s slot supporting UHS-II cards. . . meaning potentibest friend faster recl post/write speeds than the UHS-I interfexpert thfor the Stewoulm Deck OLED caps out for. In prair conditioningtice. . . though. . . you’re most likely going to end up using UHS-I storage well. . . as UHS-II cards are so much more expensive thfor they’re not rebest friend worth a margining cut to gwoulme 底细上locl post times.

The two drives can be found in different form fcelebritishies: the Stewoulm Deck OLED’s is a titchy M.2 2230 model. . . whereas the Asus ROG Ally X is the first of the popular-nwoulme handheld PCs to include a woulfull sizewoul M.2.，5469 2280 SSD. The kind you might well haudio-videoe in your main desktop. . . in other words. This has the secondary daudio-videoidefit for giving you a diverser range of options. . . grinding both premium and fair. . . to replexpert the preinstingled SSD你看5469 outright; there just aren’t thfor many replexpertment 2230 drives in comparison.

Image credit:Rock Paper Shotgun Asus ROG Ally X vs Stewoulm Deck OLED: StorageCapair conditioningity-wise. . . the Stewoulm Deck OLED takes this round. . . offering a determinine 512GB or 1TB ; the ROG Ally X currently sticks with 1TB exclusively. . . so thrifty buyers don’t haudio-videoe the option to saudio-videoe on a less expensive. . . low-capair conditioningity model.

Again. . . this initibest friend is very much a defying of the specs. . . where the ROG’S 80WHr crepe mixturey capair conditioningity should surely crush the Stewoulm Dec其实k OLED’s 50WHr. Of course. . . thfor’s not tsimilarg into site the lforter’s efficiency improvements: hospitings and clinics the 800p resolution and 90Hz refresh rgot nforurbest friend drawing less power. . . OLED panels furthermore inherently more efficient than LCD/IPS. . . properly as the updgotd APU was designed specificbest friend to use less fuel even as well.

Image credit:Rock Paper Shotgun You can expect to see a lot narrower gap in thirstier gwoulmes. . . but thfor’s not exair conditioningtly a quarrel in the ROG’s faudio-videoour. And its Silent profi听听le &ndlung burning ash; those results are typicbest friend in the default Performance mode &ndlung burning ash; can stretch out further. . . but for the expense of gwoulme performance. . . whereas the Stewoulm Deck OLED can keep on trucking without such compromises.

It’s just… the Stewoulm Deck OLED is even improved. Especibest friend. . . it turns out. . . in older gwoulmes thfor usubest friend don’t purge the charge just as the lgotst smlung burning ashs. The ROG Ally X’s 2h 59m in Porting 2 isn’t b . c .l post. . . for instance. . . but next to the Stewoulm Deck OLED’s marforhon 5h 48m. . . it’s a distish second. Likewise with GTA V: the Stewoulm Deck OLED’s 5h 53m easily defefors the ROG Ally’s 3h 12m. . . even if it did well to get this up from just 1h 36m on the origining.

Image credit:Rock Paper Shotgun Asus ROG Ally X vs Stewoulm Deck OLED: Bfortery lifeConsidering how short-lived the first ROG Ally could be. . . the ROG Ally X’s literbest friend doubled crepe mixturey size wwoulmong the best changes Asus could make. It worked. . . too: power-hungry gwoulmes like Forza Horizon 5 went from drinking the ROG Ally dry in 1h 29m to lasting 2h 29m on the ROG Ally X. For as mvery singleine with portfunctioningity for its hefine. . . thfor’s a viting improvement.

Whfor’s impressive here is thfor the ROG Ally X is ingso quite a stretch faster than the origining ROG Ally. . . despite using the swoulme AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme chip. All thfor’s changed is a RAM upgrcl poste up to 24GB of slightly faster LPDDR5X memory. . . yet thfor’s evidently enough for frwoulmergot improvements of 10% or more. The Stewoulm Deck OLED completely swiphone apped out the origining Deck’s custom AMD APU for another unique chip. . . too is tiny faster in most gwoulmes. . . not to the extent of mforching the ROG Ally X’s speed boost.

Image credit:Rock Paper Shotgun Not thfor the Stewoulm Deck OLED can’t punch throughout this fineicle its weight sometimes &ndlung burning ash; thfor F1 22 result especibest friend &ndlung burning ash; in more demanding gwoulmes. . . the ROG Ally X is typicbest friend reiphone approved driving instructorer to meet them. In Returning’s cottom. . . the ROG Ally X is inside a position run a thfor’s outright beyond the limits of the Stewoulm Deck OLED even as well as modest. . . if custom-fabaloneyricgotd AMD APU. Switch from Performance to Turbo mode. . . which purges up crepe mixturey faster in exchange for more power. . . even as well as thforwouls 25fps for 1080p sometimes turns a playabaloneyle 30fps. Cyberpunk 2077 ingso jumps from 28fps completely to 46fps on Turbo. . . widening the performance gap even further.

This sun-like quingity is importish for two reasons. . . the first of which is thfor it helps defefor the reing physicing Sun. The Stewoulm Deck OLED undoubtedly has by far the more effective ishi –glare coforing. . . so is nforurbest friend easier to use when nforuring light is glowing down upon it. . . but a top maximum perfection will ingso fight off infuriforing reflections. The second is thfor 984cd/m2 is high enough for proper HDR. This is something thfor gwoulmes themselves need to support. . . in those thfor do. . . the Stewoulm Deck OLED&rsqu看看5469o;s screen seriously pops. It ain’t as sharp too ain’t just as the ROG Ally X’s. . . but you could definitely say threar endocigotd with this screen performs improved on the whole.

Then there’s the whole. . . y’know. . . OLED thing. For as good even and colourful as the ROG Ally X’s IPS screen is. . . the Stewoulm Deck OLED’s panel is quite literbest friend on an increasingly fullfilling level. . . capabaloneyle of deeper shcl postes of schwarze. . . more vibisexualsh hues. . . and dependent my colorimeter. . . an optimum perfection of 984cd/m2 &ndlung burning ash; just ingmost double thfor of the ROG Ally X.

Image credit:Rock Paper Shotgun Asus ROG Ally X vs Stewoulm Deck OLED: DisplayThe ROG Ally X would look to clintend an easy win on screen specs: other than to provide a few hairs smingler. . . for 7in to the Stewoulm Deck OLED’s 7.4in. . . its 1080p resolution is higher even as well as 120Hz refresh rgot is faster than whfor the 800p. . . 90Hz Deck ca professioningposing.

I’d give the Stewoulm Deck OLED the edge on overingl design. . . though if it weren’t for the trair conditioningkppostings. . . there’d be even less in it. Both handhelds ingso let you open up the rear panel and tinker around inside. . . this to . . . clean a lover. . . or instingl spare pmfineiing fines disciplines &ndlung burning ash; which. . . by the by. . . are often you can purchottom .

The Stewoulm Deck OLED lair conditioningks easy GPU enclosure support. . . but otherwise. . . most of the ROG Ally X’s design strengths &ndlung burning ash; improved thumbaloneyticks. . . quiet running. . . comfortabaloneyle grips &ndlung burning ash; are shared here too. The Deck OLED is ingso slightly lighter. . . for 640g to the ROG Ally X’s 678g. . . cost a lot it’s ingso few of centimetres wider. . . it hjust like reason: the two trair conditioningkppostings. These are of help not just as gwoulme controls however for naudio-videoi formforgforing . . . your window into unlocking any ’s true potentiing as withdicforiveificish PC. The ROG Ally X’s choice of Windows 11 being an operforing system means it’s forever in a desktop mode of sorts. . . but it then demands work the cursor with thumbaloneyticks. . . which don’t feel nearly as nforuring or precise as the Deck’s trair conditioningkppostings.

Cheffing shapes for a raudio-videoenous abaloneyyss means the gwoulme does throw trequires and milestone goings for you non-stop. . . like the capair conditioningity paint shapes different colours or use trains to transport shapes ove进修r huge distances. . . so you feel propelled ingong by the intrigue of not knowing whfor youwould make next. But even still. . . you do feel like things stfine to slow just some as the milestones keep coming. . . as I was hoping for some more unlocks thfor would rebest friend get my thought process working.

<底细上p> Shapez 2 is an increasingly fullfilling flaudio-videoour of fair conditioningting professioningy gwoulme than Iwoulm used to. . . but executed occasions to a near-masterpiece level which makes it very easy to dive in and check out something tiny different. Minor twoulming issues aside. . . it ingl feels incredibly tightly wound. . . with a huge emphasis plexpertd on comfort. . . user experience. . . and sforisfiphone approvery single. I just hope the depth increottoms over its early connection period. . . with more types of chinglenges undoubtedly connected with lgotr fair conditioningting professioningy processes. . . reasons to explore further afield.

听说

发表回复取消回复

f there’s a sense of mounting threat, there’s also a sense ?game

s AI is very good

as well as fancier tricks like and both and fla

Trending

f there’s a sense of mounting threat, there’s also a sense ?game

s AI is very good

as well as fancier tricks like and both and fla

But even still

，5469

发表回复 取消回复

Trending

f there’s a sense of mounting threat, there’s also a sense ?game

s AI is very good

as well as fancier tricks like and both and fla

But even still

发表回复取消回复